News veteran Ted Koppel discussed his thoughts regarding modern journalism during his acceptance speech for the Edward R. Murrow Lifetime Achievement Award. The award was presented Friday at Beasley Coliseum during the 37th Edward R. Murrow Symposium.
Lawrence Pintak, dean of The Edward R. Murrow College of Communication, paid tribute to Koppel before introducing him to the audience. Pintak said Koppel was an icon and that his show was a Master class in world politics and journalism. “He drilled right into the hearts of the stories that affected America,” Pintak said.
As Koppel took the microphone, he acknowledged that Murrow was his idol and the “first great professional influence” in his life. “I never wanted to be anything other than Ed Murrow,” he said. Koppel’s passion for journalism was undeniable.
Koppel went on to talk about his thoughts on new media. Information is now more readily available, he said, though often incomplete. “It is harder to concentrate when everyone is talking at the same time,” Koppel said. With access to Twitter, Facebook, and other social media, “it is hard not to believe that the medium is the message,” Koppel said, but the message is still more important.
Chenwei Ling, a Murrow College graduate student, said these words of Koppel stuck out to her the most. “The medium is the tool of transmission,” Ling said, “but the message is what stays”. Ling prefers more “traditional media” such as magazines and newspapers.
Though Ling said she uses social media, she agreed with Koppel when he said it creates “looser, more careless communication.”
Still, Koppel said we must acknowledge social media because of its incomparable speed and efficiency, though it is not perfect yet. “There is nothing new about bad journalism, simply more of it.”
Koppel said what the public wants today are stories like Charlie Sheen and the Amanda Knox trial, which are “far more interesting” than the economic crisis in Greece or tensions in Iran. “We live today in a world of instant reaction and constant judgment,” Koppel said, “and journalists are giving the public what it wants.”
Koppel continued saying that when we communicate faster, we no longer are illuminated, but are simply consuming information faster than we can understand its meaning. “The more fuel we burn, the faster we go.”
In order to deal with the information intelligently, Koppel said, we need time to reflect. But society has developed an intolerance to pause. He acknowledged that the role of journalism has changed from objective reporting of the facts to the need to publish the latest “breaking news” or tabloid scandal in order to satisfy the public.
Koppel predicts the public will realize and question why the media “feed us trivial crap while these terrible things are happening.” During this realization, “no one will be happy,” Koppel said, “but what we gave you was what you wanted.”
The crowd absorbed these final thoughts while erupting into a standing ovation. Koppel stayed on for a question and answer session with the audience.
Following the conclusion of the symposium, Joanna and Brent Steward, a WSU alumna and her husband, said they both were in high school when Nightline, Koppel’s show, began in 1980. Through Nightline, they both became aware of world affairs, the Stewards said.
Brent said he believes that Koppel truly can stay objective in any given situation, as he proved in his answers to the crowd. “His ability to interview is second to none,” Brent added. “I think he is in the same caliber as Walter Cronkite.”
“It was wonderful to hear him. If you ever want to learn about journalism,” Joanna said, “just watch him.”
- LM -
Sources:
Ted Koppel
(At symposium)
Dean Lawrence Pintak
(At symposium)
Chenwei Ling
509-592-8825
Brent Steward
509-335-3933
Joanna Steward
509-335-3933
Outline:
I. Lede
A. Dean Pintak – Quote
1. Introduces Koppel
II. Ted Koppel
A. Thanks for award
B. Murrow tribute
1. His hero as a child
C. New Media
1. Quote
2. Media is the message
a. Quote – Chenwei Ling
b. Agree with Koppel
3. Acknowledging social media
4. Giving the public what it wants
a. Quote
b. Ending statement
III. Joanna and Brent Steward
A. Both speak about Koppel
B. Quote – Brent
C. Quote – Joanna